A Patent That Has A Legal Life Of 20 Years And A Useful Life Of Less Than 20 Years Should:

A Patent That Has A Legal Life Of 20 Years And A Useful Life Of Less Than 20 Years Should: A. Be amortized over 20 years B. Be expensed immediately C. Be written off as impaired D. Be amortized over its useful life
The correct option of this multiple choice question is D, as Useful Life of patent can be shorter than legal life and over that period, the patent will provide economic benefits to the business by increasing its sales.

Actually, the amortization on Patent is charged to expense over its useful life or legal life whichever is less. For example, if the legal life is 20 years but the useful life is 18 years, then it should be amortized over its useful life of 18 year during which it is valuable for the business and generate revenues for it.

If the legal life is less than useful life, then it means that invention period is expired due to non-payment of periodic maintenance fees, which is paid for maintaining legal life of patent. In this case, amortized on patent is charged upto the legal life.

The option A is not correct choice here as patent can’t be amortized exceeding the legal life. It is amortized over its useful or legal life whichever is less.

The option B is also wrong choice here as amortization on patent is charged per year and not immediately as this intangible asset is charged to expense after the decrease in its value.

The option C is incorrect choice here as if the patent’s carrying value is less than its recoverable value, which is a loss for the business, then it is impaired but in this mcq, there is no such situation mentioned, i.e., if patent has lost its significant value in the market, then it is impaired as it is not valuable for the business or it is not able to provide future economic benefits to the business, otherwise, it is amortized. Impairment on Intangible Assets is a loss to the business and it is deducted from relevant intangible assets on balance sheet.

Comments