A Patent That Has A Legal Life Of 20 Years And A Useful Life Of Less Than 20 Years Should:
Actually, the amortization on Patent is charged to expense over its useful
life or legal life whichever is less. For example, if the legal life is 20
years but the useful life is 18 years, then it should be amortized over its
useful life of 18 year during which it is valuable for the business and
generate revenues for it.
If the legal life is less than useful life, then it means that invention
period is expired due to non-payment of periodic maintenance fees, which is
paid for maintaining legal life of patent. In this case, amortized on patent is
charged upto the legal life.
The option A is not correct choice here as patent can’t be amortized
exceeding the legal life. It is amortized over its useful or legal life
whichever is less.
The option B is also wrong choice here as amortization on patent is charged
per year and not immediately as this intangible asset is charged to expense
after the decrease in its value.
The option C is incorrect choice here as if the patent’s carrying value is less than its recoverable value, which is a loss for the business, then it is impaired but in this mcq, there is no such situation mentioned, i.e., if patent has lost its significant value in the market, then it is impaired as it is not valuable for the business or it is not able to provide future economic benefits to the business, otherwise, it is amortized. Impairment on Intangible Assets is a loss to the business and it is deducted from relevant intangible assets on balance sheet.
Comments